Thursday, February 20, 2020

An Unannounced Inspection Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

An Unannounced Inspection - Case Study Example Likewise, it was noted that the plant manager is not within the premises and the area where the employee who complained works is reported to be currently undergoing a major renovation for a process change for the product in the line. The Questions and Responses How would you act, what actions should you take, and what would you do? According to OSHA inspection standards, employers should be aware that inspections are regularly conducted without the need for advance notice or any presentation of warrant to inspect. In this case, an employee reported a complaint, which is one of the requirements where OSHA would be able to enter and inspect the worksite without obtaining a warrant or even the employer’s express consent. Therefore, the only expected and appropriate action that should be taken is to allow the OSHA inspector to undertake the needed inspection and to address all inquiries or questions regarding the complaint in the worksite under major renovation; with proper advice of the matter from the plant manager. One could call the authorized officer in charge of safety and the plant manager just to formally advise them that the OSHA inspector is currently at the plant and to enable one to effectively assist the inspector, as duly and lawfully required. Should you challenge the validity of the OSHA inspector's request, or their right to enter the workplace? One has not authority to challenge the validity of the OSHA inspector’s request because by virtue of law, specifically relating to â€Å"Section 5(a)(1) of the Act, known as the â€Å"General Duty Clause,† which requires that every working man and woman must be provided with a safe and healthful workplace† (Occupational Safety & Health Administration, 2002, p. 1), the disgruntled worker has the right to forward any perceived concern that could possible endanger his health and safety in the work setting. Or should you request a warrant to enter the workplace, and thereby gain some time to make sure everything is in order back in the plant? There really is nothing to hide at the plant and the OSHA inspector could even assist in recommending the most appropriate methods to ensure that safety and security of the workers are addressed; while the major renovation for a process change for the product in the line is taking place. Can you gain any time to check with your in-area safety supervisor first? Or, should you immediately comply with the request for the inspection? Explain your answers. As previously noted, one strongly believes that the policy of the organization in terms of reporting relevant incidents (including the area safety supervisor and even the plant manager) must be followed and adhered to. Doing so does not mean that one is buying extra time but following protocols and policies in reporting relevant incidents within the organization for proper approval, as needed. Scenario #2: Serious Near-Miss Crane Incident Brief Case Overview Being the EH&S pr ofessiona

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Ethics and Law in Business and Society Research Paper

Ethics and Law in Business and Society - Research Paper Example Significant analysis and evaluation of the policies have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of these policies. Lastly, the study will provide some recommendation plans in order to overcome the possible issues and challenges. History of the Act It is important for the government, authorized bodies and employers to take care of the needs of the employees in an organization as employees are considered as one of the major assets of an organization. Significant work performance of the skilled and effective employees helps the business organization to achieve significant growth rate. In addition to this, effective business performs ace of the business units ensures economic growth of a nation. This specific act or program was required in order to cover and support the basic rights of the employees in an organization. This Federal Employees’ compensation act was developed in the year 1916 to ensure social welfare. This act was developed in order o support those employees w ho are physically or mentally unable to justify job responsibility. The major objective behind the development for the acts and programs was basically for a good social cause. It was highly important for the employees who are disabled, retired or physically challenged to get the benefits from the employers or from the federal government or from the authorized bodies to look after himself and his family. These funds can be provided to all the employees who are affected due to the workplace-related issues. In addition to this, several Federal Employees’ Compensation Act programs were started to organize by the federal government in order to improve the scenario of the society. According to this act, an individual can get different benefits based on the eligibility. The elements of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act program include several aspects. According to this act, each and every mentally or physically affected employee in a workplace can get significant compen sation or service benefits (Ullmann, 2003). It is important for an organization to ensure healthy and safe workplace environment. The federal government of United States of America supported this act and act related programs to ensure the security of each and every disabled employee. Several types of benefit policies are proposed and developed in order to improve the lifestyle of these types of federal employees. However, the policymakers failed to develop the policy measures that created several conflicts and issues in later part. Several differentiated policies were developed and implemented under this Federal Employees’ Compensation Act in the year 1974 due to rising problems and issues in the states. however, the federal government of United States of America and other policymakers somehow failed to fulfill its overall objective due to lack of effective policy measures and i9nadequate development of eligibility criteria.